|
|
|||||||||||
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht
Department of Medical, Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Maastricht University
Department of Medical, Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht
Department of Psychiatry, VU Medical Center/GGZ BuitenAmstel, Amsterdam
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology and Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University, Leiden
Department of Psychiatry, VU Medical Center/GGZ BuitenAmstel, Amsterdam
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology and Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University, Leiden
Department of Psychiatry, VU Medical Center/GGZ BuitenAmstel, Amsterdam
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, University Hospital Maastricht, and Department of Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Thea van Asselt, University Hospital Maastricht, Department KEMTA, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. Email: avas{at}kemta.azm.nl
None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
Background
Schema-focused therapy (SFT) and transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) for borderline personality disorder were recently compared in a randomised multicentre trial.
Aims
To assess the societal cost-effectiveness of SFT v. TFP in treating borderline personality disorder.
Method
Costs were assessed by interview. Health-related quality of life was measured using EQ–5D. Outcomes were costs per recovered patient (recovery assessed with the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index) and costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
Results
Mean 4-year bootstrapped costs were
37 826 for SFT and
46 795
for TFP (95% uncertainty interval for difference –21 775 to 3546); QALYs
were 2.15 for SFT and 2.27 for TFP (95% UI –0.51 to 0.28). The
percentages of patients who recovered were 52% and 29% respectively. The SFT
intervention was less costly and more effective than TFP (dominant), for
recovery; it saved
90 457 for one QALY loss.
Conclusions
Despite the initial slight disadvantage in QALYs, there is a high probability that compared with TFP, SFT is a cost-effective treatment for borderline personality disorder.
Related articles in BJP:
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |