BJP Evidence-Based Mental Health
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (2007) 191: s19-s22. doi: 10.1192/bjp.191.51.s19
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCRONE, P.
Right arrow Articles by KNAPP, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCRONE, P.
Right arrow Articles by KNAPP, M.

EDITORIALS

Economic evaluation of early intervention services

PAUL McCRONE, PhD

King’s College London, Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK

MARTIN KNAPP, PhD

Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

Correspondence: Paul McCrone, PO24 HSRD, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. Email: p.mccrone{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None.

Early intervention services have been introduced in a number of countries, but the evidence base to support them is limited. In particular there are very few economic evaluations, which are crucial if decision-makers are to have a better understanding of how scarce resources can be used appropriately. This paper discusses the different approaches used in economic evaluations and shows how these differ in the way in which outcomes are measured. The most useful forms of evaluation are cost-effectiveness and cost–utility analysis. We describe how the results of evaluations can be interpreted using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and acceptability curves. Finally, the paper summarises some key evidence to date on early intervention services and economic evaluations currently being undertaken.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.