BJP CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (2007) 191: s21-s28. doi: 10.1192/bjp.191.50.s21
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, R.
Right arrow Articles by Priebe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, R.
Right arrow Articles by Priebe, S.

REVIEW ARTICLES

Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia

Rosemarie McCabe, PhD, Marya Saidi, MSc and Stefan Priebe, MD

Department of Psychiatry, University of London, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, UK

Correspondence: Dr Rosemarie McCabe, Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Newham Centre for Mental Health, Glen Road, London E13 8SP, UK. Email: r.mccabe{at}qmul.ac.uk

Declaration of Interest None.

Background Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used to evaluate the care of people with schizophrenia.

Aims To review established and emerging patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia research, assessment tools and key findings.

Method A non-systematic review addressing relevant constructs, the associated scales and key empirical findings.

Results Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia relate either to evaluation of illness and benefit from treatment or to resilience of the self. Of the former, needs for care, treatment satisfaction and the therapeutic relationship are most common. Less common are symptoms, insight, attitude towards medication, and clinical communication. Increasing expectations of treatment have led to new measures assessing resilience of the self, including empowerment, self-esteem, sense of coherence and recovery. Scores of different patient-related outcomes overlap and are influenced by a general tendency, largely influenced by mood, for more or less positive appraisal.

Conclusions The conceptual and empirical basis for different patient-reported outcomes varies, with most data available for treatment satisfaction. More than one such outcome should be used only if there is a specific hypothesis. For new patient-reported outcomes, relative independence from existing constructs should be demonstrated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Tyrer
From the Editor's desk
The British Journal of Psychiatry, November 1, 2008; 193(5): 434 - 434.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Tyrer
From the Editor's desk
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 193(2): 178 - 178.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
T. Burns
Evolution of outcome measures in schizophrenia
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 191(50): s1 - s6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.