|
|
|||||||||||
SUPPLEMENT |
Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London
Institute of Preventive Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
Department of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Italy
Clinical and Social Psychiatry Research Unit, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Daniel Chisholm, Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, 7 Windsor Walk, London SE5 8BB
Declaration of interest No conflict of interest. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
1 In fact, the input from family caregivers was assessed in another instrument used in this study, the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ) (van Wijngaarden et al, 2000, this supplement).
Background Cross-cultural comparison of mental health service utilisation and costs is complicated by the heterogeneity of service systems. For data to be locally meaningful yet internationally comparable, a carefully constructed approach to its collection is required.
Aims To develop a research method and instrument for the collection of data on the service utilisation and related characteristics of people with mental disorders, as the basis for calculating the costs of care.
Method Various approaches to the collection of service use data and key stages of instrument development were identified in order to select the most appropriate methods.
Results Based on previous work, and following translation and cross-cultural validation, an instrument was developed: the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory - European Version (CSSRI-EU). This was subsequently administered to 404 people with schizophrenia across five countries.
Conclusion The CSSRI-EU provides a standardised yet adaptable method for collating service receipt and associated data alongside assessment of patient outcomes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. BECKER, M. KNAPP, G. THORNICROFT, H. C. KNUDSEN, A. H. SCHENE, M. TANSELLA, and J. L. VAZQUEZ-BARQUERO Aims, outcome measures, study sites and patient sample: EPSILON Study I The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2000; 177 (39): s1 - s7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. KNUDSEN, J. L. VAZQUEZ-BARQUERO, B. WELCHER, L. GAITE, T. BECKER, D. CHISHOLM, M. RUGGERI, A. H. SCHENE, and G. THORNICROFT Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of outcome measurements for schizophrenia: EPSILON Study 2 The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2000; 177 (39): s8 - s14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. SCHENE, M. KOETER, B. VAN WIJNGAARDEN, H. C. KNUDSEN, M. LEESE, M. RUGGERI, I. R. WHITE, and J. L. VAZQUEZ-BARQUERO Methodology of a multi-site reliability study: EPSILON Study 3 The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2000; 177 (39): s15 - s20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. McCRONE, M. LEESE, G. THORNICROFT, G. GRIFFITHS, S. PADFIELD, A. H. SCHENE, H. CHARLOTTE KNUDSEN, J. L. VAZQUEZ-BARQUERO, A. LASALVIA, and I. R. WHITE Reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need - European Version: EPSILON Study 6 The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2000; 177 (39): s34 - s40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. RUGGERI, A. LASALVIA, R. DALL'AGNOLA, M. TANSELLA, B. VAN WIJNGAARDEN, H. C. KNUDSEN, M. LEESE, and L. GAITE Development, internal consistency and reliability of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale - European Version: EPSILON Study 7 The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2000; 177 (39): s41 - s48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |