|
|
|||||||||||
The British Journal of Psychiatry 151: 355-361 (1987)
© 1987 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
DA Grayson
NH&MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, Canberra.
Bimodality in a distribution of symptoms is often claimed to be convincing evidence that a disorder is categorical, a discrete disease entity, rather than the extreme on a continuous dimension. However, using concepts from contemporary psychometric theory it is shown that bimodality can arise from the dimensional viewpoint. In fact, contrary to the usual belief, bimodality would be expected to occur in many research contexts if the dimensional alternative were correct.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. S. Acton and J. J. Zodda Classification of Psychopathology: Goals and Methods in an Empirical Approach Theory Psychology, June 1, 2005; 15(3): 373 - 399. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ruscio and A. M. Ruscio A Structure-Based Approach to Psychological Assessment: Matching Measurement Models to Latent Structure Assessment, March 1, 2002; 9(1): 4 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |