BJP Email content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shagass, C.
Right arrow Articles by Josiassen, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shagass, C.
Right arrow Articles by Josiassen, R. C.

The British Journal of Psychiatry 144: 581-592 (1984)
© 1984 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Psychiatric diagnostic discriminations with combinations of quantitative EEG variables

C Shagass, RA Roemer, JJ Straumanis and RC Josiassen

The possible psychiatric diagnostic utility of certain quantitative EEG measures was evaluated by further analysis of previously reported data from 242 unmedicated patients and 94 non-patients. Time series of amplitude, frequency and wave symmetry measures for 12-lead EEGs (eyes closed and open) were factor analyzed across leads. Factor scores meeting specified criteria in multivariate analyses were entered into discriminant analyses comparing pairs of the following groups: non- patients, neurotics, personality disorders, overt schizophrenics, latent schizophrenics, major depressives and manics. The following discriminations were obtained with at least 50 per cent sensitivity, and diagnostic confidence rates from 69 to 92 per cent: (a) non- psychotic patients (neuroses, personality disorders) from overt schizophrenics, latent schizophrenics or manics; (b) major depressives from latent schizophrenics or manics; (c) non-patients from schizophrenics (overt and latent), depressives or manics. Most discriminations were replicable in split-half analyses. Possible utility of EEG measures in differential diagnosis is supported.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
D. P. Holschneider and A. F. Leuchter
Clinical Neurophysiology Using Electroencephalography in Geriatric Psychiatry: Neurobiologic Implications and Clinical Utility
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, October 1, 1999; 12(3): 150 - 164.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1984 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.