BJP Try Psychiatric Bulletin Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Mental Science (1960) 106: 231-240. doi: 10.1192/bjp.106.442.231
© 1960 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knowles, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knowles, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, C. J.

Experimental Studies of the Placebo Response

J. B. Knowles, B.Sc., Dip.Psych.

C. J. Lucas, M.B., M.R.C.P., D.P.M.

Medical Research Council, Clinical Psychiatry Research Group, Graylingwell Hospital, Chichester

ABSTRACT

Four experiments are reported in which the effect of a placebo in healthy subjects has been studied. The placebo was a small white lactose tablet which was administered orally and introduced as a drug with potential effects. For thirty minutes following the administration of the placebo the subjects recorded symptoms on a check list of 26 items, half of which were pleasant and half unpleasant.

In two of the experiments the subjects spent the thirty-minute observation period sitting alone (individual conditions) and in the other two, subjects were seated in groups of three (group conditions).

Before each experiment all the subjects completed the M.P.I.

Sixty-six per cent. of the subjects (N=59) reported one or more effects. Analysis of the data led to the following conclusions:

  1. The total number of responses reported remained constant despite altering the conditions of administration (i.e. "individual" and "group").
  2. The proportion of pleasant to unpleasant responses remained approximately one-half throughout the experiments.
  3. The relationship between placebo responding and personality varied according to the conditions of administration. This was clearest for neuroticism where the correlation was high (r=·74) under "group" but insignificant under "individual" conditions.
    The interpretation of the correlations with extraversion was less clear. When homogeneous samples were tested the pattern of correlations was the converse for that of neuroticism, i.e. significant correlation under "individual" but insignificant under "group" conditions. However, when theological students, as opposed to nurses, were tested, the correlation became negative. A possible explanation was discussed.
  4. "Stress" administration in which the importance of the research and the necessity for accurate observations were emphasized, increased responses.
    The findings, and their relation to those previously reported, were discussed in detail.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1960 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.